https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/12/251205054734.htmIt took a little while, but Cambridge's Cavendish laboratory has announced something which sounds remarkably similar to something I wrote quite a while ago about forcing electron triplets to collide with singleton electrons to efficiently generate light in an LED.
The experiment showed that not only is it efficient, it generates a specific frequency of near-infrared light and no other frequencies, which is useful.
https://mega.nz/file/ERBkRbYA#Uj-iMYjsAPr7PqwhDM2Q_NsJRYONnTiiBqVMUxG0oDsPublished just about exactly two years before Cambridge made this announcement.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09601-yIt's incredible how many Chinese researchers they have everywhere, including at Cambridge. A high proportion of the things I publish wind up getting ripped off by Chinese researchers who are oftentimes working outside of China, but it's getting to be a trend. Speaking of Chinese researchers, we had four confirmed MSS intelligence officers in my coffee shop yesterday as well as various FBI people. There was literally no question about it. The one American even made a point of walking up to me and making a remark purposefully the day prior, but they don't return my phone calls. It is incredible the resources that China dumps into collecting information about people who do not live in China if they might have information of value. They seem more concerned with how I get my information (the same goes for the Americans) and neither the Chinese nor the American IOs will make contact unless they can be certain that doing so will not compromise their ability to continue to look for some unseen person they are convinced is feeding me information which I merely relay. Both refuse to accept the narrative that I am coming up with these ideas independently but neither is willing to risk the other side gaining an exclusive partnership. I operate transparently and have offered repeatedly to stop sharing my ideas and those offers were ignored. Once the cat is out of the bag, as we say, the information cannot go back to being "confidential." It seems to be that securing inventions should be a higher priority than nabbing a few Chinese IOs, but I guess that's not how they see it. Of course, merely knowing the identities of IOs operating within the United States rarely leads to arrests and the U.S. has released every single spy it has captured in the past 10 years, usually for nothing in return.
Wouldn't it make more sense for them to control their theorists and scientists and to use a decoy to bait the Chinese?
In other news, the U.K. is continuing to discuss the importance of the Norwegian coastline and they say they're concerned about Russian submarine activity. Clearly the U.K. intends to mount a provocation.