Путин иного мнения о Трампе.
И я слышал, что Трамп грозил бомбить Москву.
Как сторонний наблюдатель интересно бы задать кандидатам вопрос:
Готов ли Трамп развязать ядерный Армагедон и уничтожить планету Земля, но не уступить Путину?
И второй тоже.
Готова ли Харрис развязать ядерный Армагедон и уничтожить планету Земля, но не уступить Путину?
Harris would commit such an atrocity long before Trump would. Trump is well-known for his bluster, but he is what we call a "chicken-hawk." He threatens the use of force and then is loathe to use it. This is so predictable with him that it actually undermines our credible deterrent. If we have a powerful military and our enemies get the idea we're unwilling to use it, there is no point in having it. The best idea is to exercise the judicious use of power when appropriate. Democrats see every problem as a nail and they see the military as the hammer. Republicans want to increase military spending but don't want to use the military even when the situation calls for it (George Bush was the exception to this) and they don't seem to care if the money comes from deficit spending. Neither party wants to tax the rich, which means the country is doomed to fiscal insolvency even without a war. We now have multiple companies, nearly all American, which are by themselves worth more than $1 Trillion, two of which; Apple and Microsoft; are worth in excess of $3 Trillion. This would be a boon to our country if only these companies paid their taxes. Apple and Microsoft continue to give business to China, meaning that China is enriched just as much as the United States through these corrupt business ventures. Microsoft has also been co-opted substantially by the Hindustani moles such as Satya Nadella and other businessmen of his persuasion whose true loyalty is to the State of India and not to the United States.
History tells us that most wars are started by bankers who profit regardless of which side wins and who issue loans to both warring parties. We face not only the risk of rogue parties such as Ukrainian fanatics employing weapons of mass destruction, but of established powers such as the United States attempting to use military might to prevent the natural hemorrhaging of capital and industry toward other nations as the empire collapses. Our nation was founded by a mixture of English and Dutch settlers who were everything from traders to farmers but who were conservative Christians. People in my country lived Christian lifestyles and adhered to their traditions from the time of the settling of the first English colony in 1607 right up until about 1967... about 360 years. I remain convinced of something I first noticed at the age of 14, which was that feminism was what destroyed this country and feminism is what is making us miserable. Without a family, a man is demoralized and has nothing for which to fight. Once that basic human need is forfeited, the loss of a home or the loss of a country seem to be merely minor additional insults in an already miserable existence. This is the fundamental reason I think that Americans do not openly revolt. They cannot get angry at the government for endangering or destroying their families because women, absent any moral values, have already done the essential work of pre-emptively destroying those families. Thus, the government does not get the blame for this and neither do the corporations and thus, we have no open revolt. Men will fight to the death to protect their families and to protect others around them and even to protect institutions, but because men are intrinsically unselfish (most of them,) they won't openly revolt simply for their own benefit. Men need a cause to fight for and indolent, obese negro social workers and Department of Motor Vehicles employees are not exactly Helen of Troy.
Thus, after total feminist control of this country for multiple generations, we are now at the point where marijuana dispensaries are openly operating on nearly every street corner in the United States and men may dress as women. We had succeeded in imprisoning about 33% of the negro population of this country under presidents Reagan, Bush and Clinton but Donald Trump let most of these prisoners out. This was an aggravating factor in the 2020 riots. Literally millions of negro prisoners who had been imprisoned for everything ranging from drug possession to armed robbery were granted early release between 2017 and 2020 by the order of the President. Donald Trump could have prevented the legalization of marijuana (at the State level) by federalizing the National Guard and arresting the Governors of any state which defied him, but he did not do this. This proves to me that he is a weak man and without any principles. The Democrats are absolutely willing to have their enemies imprisoned or killed, but unfortunately, they support the legalization of narcotics. The fact that legalization of narcotics was even being considered is proof of the collapse. This was once a Christian nation. Now, even so-called Christians openly sin and Churches are used as a mechanism for providing emotional reinforcement to sinners. The Churches offer forgiveness in exchange for tithing and tell the sinners that it is permissible to keep right on sinning. Churches, which were once a place whee one could meet a respectable woman, are now the last place one would want to go to meet their wife, at least in the United States.
I intend no disrespect toward women, however, if a woman is not given moral values, she is going to behave as an animal and that is the problem. One cannot find a good woman if the women are not given values any more than one would able to purchase a dog of good breeding as a pet if that dog were not properly bred and trained. Parents do not raise their children properly and thus, we live in a zoo where the animals are permitted to roam the streets without steel bars to protect us from the animals. There is a very old joke in my country, possibly from W.C. Fields: "You know what my favorite thing is about the zoo? The animals are behind bars."
Another thing I cannot understand is the way in which negro culture, which was once upright and Christian prior to the 1960s in America, suddenly deviated and became associated with criminality. Negroes protested and fought for access to the caucasian schools and for "integration." The negroes had separate schools which were also taxpayer funded and which were of high-quality. They did not destroy these schools. There were negroes who did not want integration and who hated white people and wanted to continue having their own schools. Thus, once integration happened, they found themselves forced to go to school with whites and began taking measures to sabotage white schools. They wanted nothing to do with white culture and I suppose it was because they resented their exclusion to the point where they no longed wished to be included. This was self-sabotage for them. This was where the deviation began. The English and Dutch began the unjust practice of slavery (they even enslaved light-skinned people through indentured servitude in the 19th Century through 'Company Towns.') This refusal to properly integrate (although we had titular integration) has resulted in a kind of slow-motion Civil War in which the negro uses the entitlement (social welfare) system in order to deplete our resources and we must spend huge amounts of money in order to prevent total chaos by heavily policing the boundaries between the inner cities and on prisons. In any other country, a person would be executed for committing theft but in our country, they get a slap on the wrist.
People of my persuasion i.e. white people are unlikely to fight to support the United States in the event of a war, at this point, given the degree to which negroes, who are actively at war with us (they have made this very clear) have co-opted our government and now occupy all of the important positions as clerks. It is a shame because most of the negroes are not bad people and the ones in the United Kingdom behave exactly as you or I might; it is only the American negro which is unusual. We must also be distrustful of police as Democrats wish to revoke our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms and it is the police which fail to protect us from criminals and it is the police who would take our weapons away from us in the event of a new prohibition. Some conservatives in my country are vocally in favor of the police, but this is only because they see them as a panacea that will keep negro criminals in check. Others shrewdly distrust any form of government control and wish to form partnerships with conservative negroes who share our Christian values. I, myself, do not believe in God but I live a Christian lifestyle on the basis of the merits of the lifestyle, for its own sake.
