Чтобы у вас не было проблем с авторством - мы это обсуждали на форуме.
Но это по РФ, а по США будет немного иначе.
Застолбить авторство.
https://discuss-science.ru/index.php?topic=61.0
viXra.org - место для публикаций статей.
This is an interesting topic in its own respect. As for Vixra, I have tried using Vixra, that was actually the first thing I tried, but I was shadow-banned (or the admin simply stopped approving my submissions for some reason.) Thus, there are only a few items there under my name. Prior to this I was using 4chan /pol/ and /sci/ boards. That is where the first 192 or 193 of my works are (and thus why the number on Internet Archive does not match the count I am claiming.) I think I may be the only person in history to use the term, "pseudosuperconduction" and thus if you type this into their archive website's search, you'll find a posting which will lead you to a unique moniker I used prior to a certain date which will, from there, lead you to my other postings, but be warned, those accessing that information have been on the receiving end of cyber attacks which I believe to be Chinese in origin. There does seem to be someone passively trying to remove my content, most likely someone who wants to claim my works as their own. It happened at the 8kun website due a hack and it took a more dramatic form when LiveScience was literally forced to close. This means that it could just be some greedy person in the U.S. or Europe behind some of the suppression efforts, but we may be dealing with multiple parties. As I said, I have a Ukrainian who hates my guts who is trying to stop me but also have to consider Chinese and American meddling may be happening concurrently. There are so many people who might want what I have. I have not merely information, but the means to get more. The simplest way to explain how I do it is that although the future is largely not set in stone, science is set in stone. As we follow the scientific method, telemetry from the future is always the same with regard to science and thus these signals come through clearly. When I receive signals, it saves us from having to perform the experiments and we can investigate other technologies which, in turn, alters the signal received. I only have to analyze my visions and write them down. The hard work has been done for me.
My objection is to the fact that someone is trying to stifle my attempts to share my ideas, not so much that someone is getting rich and I am not. I would have liked to have secured a greater standard of living for myself but perhaps this is not fated.
Notary is a good option and does not cost much, but it is not a replacement for a patent. For someone who wants to sell licensing rights, a patent is needed. A notary is enough to get your name into the history books and also enough to endanger the patent claims of others, particularly if you have something posted online which undermines the priority of the patent. According to the U.S. Patent Office, something posted online can be rejected if later submitted for patent protection. Someone out there is a little worried that the Patent Office will reject their patent because of this issue.
I believe I am doing the right thing and the wise thing by using an entirely false identity to share my ideas and not notarizing them or linking them to my true identity. I prefer being unknown to my government and I certainly prefer being unknown to dangerous private parties obsessed with making money. I do not share this obsession. If I do not receive my money, I will hold my government accountable for that. I do it every day by sharing ideas which they'd probably rather that we keep under our collective hat. Perhaps one day, they will cut me some sort of deal to get me to stop doing this. That may, much as it seems like the hard way of doing things, given U.S. bureaucracy, could be simpler than navigating the patent system. It's not so much the complexity as the financial cost. What I am doing is phenomenally dangerous and the fact that I do not seek credit has kept me alive. An American named Stanley Meyer fraudulently claimed in the 1990s to have invented a very efficient hydrolysis mechanism and convinced some media outlets to cover his story. He used his real name and even secured a patent, although the patent didn't describe anything fundamentally new. In 1998, two men claiming to be from NATO arranged a meeting with Stanley and his brother at a Cracker Barrel restaurant in Virginia. They invited him to drink a toast with cranberry juice, which they claimed was traditional in The Netherlands. When Stanley drank the cranberry juice, he immediately clutched at his throat and jumped up from his table. He ran out the front door of the restaurant and collapsed in front of the building. His brother had followed him out. He declared, "I've been poisoned!" before losing consciousness. By the time the ambulance arrived, he was dead. His brother went back into the restaurant to question the two representatives of NATO (in actuality, assassins from Royal Dutch Shell) and they were gone and so were the glasses of cranberry juice. Although Stanley Meyer's inventions were fraudulent, he had convinced wealthy people that they might be real. They were convinced enough that they didn't want to take the chance of losing profits. The coroner found no evidence of foul play, according to the official report.
Given this, why in the world would I
ever put my real name on my work when the things I've invented are likely to turn every industry and every country on Earth upside down? The oil industry, gone. The automotive industry as we know it, transformed. The electric utilities, transformed. Computer industry, transformed. The idea of controlling the proliferation of nuclear weapons is about to disappear. People are about to be able to fly their family automobiles over national boundaries without passports and there's little those countries will be able to do except shoot down family automobiles with missiles to stop this. The idea of national boundaries will go the way of 8-track tapes. While Russia and China might be forcing people at gunpoint to work as scientists (this is what Americans believe) America employs retards as scientists and kills its own real scientists and this is it is now falling behind. In that kind of climate, I would never put my name on my work. It's not so much the government as the private corporations and the fact that the American government does not protect people from private corporations. I figure, as long as I don't interfere with these exploitative people's quest to get rich, everyone will be happy. Sadly, for whoever is applying for these patents, they will face adversity from these major corporations. I am still trying to find out exactly which of my ideas got LiveScience shut down; which one they tried to patent and who is behind that. One researcher in Sweden who attempted a gaslighting gambit with me stands out as I had told him about the LiveScience thread along with others at his and other universities. He seemed intent on usurping my ideas but was very insulting. It's possible that he secured a patent and that Swedish FOI is pulling strings with out FBI but it could be literally anyone. It's going to be like that episode of South Park where there's a dispute over who came up with the "fishsticks" joke and those who falsely take credit keep turning up dead while the real author is simply happy that he made other people happy and is consequently safe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZttypFNEKIIn Russia, you're lucky in a way because Chinese are easy to spot and are not allowed to simply walk around, at least that's my outsider's perspective. We have so many Chinese-Americans and other Asian nationalities that they do not discriminate against them, both because there are too many of them for that to be practical and because of leftist political correctness.
